\begin
Discover why over 25 million people worldwide trust Overleaf with their work.
\documentclass[12pt,english,DIV=13]{reviewresponse}
%% Language
\usepackage{babel}
\usepackage[babel]{microtype}
\usepackage[babel]{csquotes}
%% Fonts
\usepackage[T1]{fontenc}
\usepackage{lmodern}
%\usepackage{newcent} % different font
%\usepackage[scaled]{beramono} % different monospace font
%% Bibliography
\usepackage[backend=biber,style=ieee,dashed=false,url=false,isbn=false,defernumbers=true,refsection=section]{biblatex}
\bibliography{literature.bib}
\usepackage{hyperref}
\title{My Awesome but Very Long Paper Title\\That Spans Multiple Lines}
\author{Donald Duck\affil{1,*} and Mickey Mouse\affil{2}}
\affiliation{
\affil{1} Department of Quacking, Duck University, Duckburg, USA\\
\affil{2} Department of Mousing, Mouse University, Mouseton, USA
}
\journal{IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications}
\manuscript{TWC-2020-X}
\editorname{Dr. Doom}
\begin{document}
\maketitle
% Cover Letter
\input{cover_letter.tex}
% Response to Editor
\editor
\begin{generalcomment}
The reviewer(s) have suggested some minor revisions to your manuscript. Therefore, I invite you to respond to the reviewer(s)' comments and revise your manuscript.
\end{generalcomment}
\begin{revresponse}[We appreciate your handling of the review process.]
According to the reviewers' comments, we have checked our manuscript and addressed them in the following way:
\begin{enumerate}
\item We added content.
\item We removed our wrong statements in Section~I.
\end{enumerate}
\end{revresponse}
\begin{concludingresponse}[to the Editor]
Thank you for your valuable comments on our manuscript.
We have done our best to incorporate changes to reflect the suggestions, which allowed us to improve the quality of our work.
\end{concludingresponse}
% Reviewer 1
\reviewer
\begin{generalcomment}
General comment about the work.
\end{generalcomment}
\begin{revresponse}[Thank you for your feedback.]
We have carefully addressed all the issues item by item as follows.
\end{revresponse}
\begin{revcomment}
Your work is really good. However, you should change the title.
\end{revcomment}
\begin{revresponse}
We agree that the title is somewhat misleading.
We therefore changed it in the current version of the manuscript.
\end{revresponse}
\begin{revcomment}
Everything else is really good.
\end{revcomment}
\begin{revresponse}
We totally agree. We also added the following to the new version of the manuscript
\begin{changes}
This really important sentence was added to the paper.
\end{changes}
\end{revresponse}
\begin{revcomment}[breakable]
If we have a\\
very long comment\\
that spans\\
many lines\\
we can pass arguments\\
to the underlying tcolorbox,\\
such as \texttt{breakable}\\
to allow breaking up\\
the comment box.
\end{revcomment}
\begin{revresponse}
That is a great feature. Thank you.
\end{revresponse}
\begin{concludingresponse}[]
Thank you for your valuable comments on our manuscript.
\end{concludingresponse}
% Reviewer 2
\reviewer
\label{rev:2}
\begin{generalcomment}
In general, the work is well-written. However, I have the following concerns.
\end{generalcomment}
\begin{revresponse}[Thank you for your feedback.]
We have carefully addressed all the issues item by item as follows.
\end{revresponse}
\begin{revcomment}[label={comment:work-not-good}]
The work is not really good.
\end{revcomment}
\begin{revresponse}
:(
\end{revresponse}
\begin{revcomment}
You forgot to cite a very important reference (where I am an author)!
\end{revcomment}
\begin{revresponse}
We are aware that citations on Google Scholar are very important to you.
Therefore, we added reference \cite{ReviewerReference}.
Also check out our article \cite{Besser2020}.
\printpartbibliography{ReviewerReference,Besser2020}
\end{revresponse}
\begin{revcomment}
The template you are using for responding to my comments is excellent.
\end{revcomment}
\begin{revresponse}
We agree.
One cool feature is that comments are automatically labeled with the following pattern: \verb|comment:<rev_num>.<comment_num>|, which can then be used in a \verb|\ref|~command.
So this comment has number~\ref{comment:2.3}.
(Note that this also automatically changes if the \texttt{revnumtocomment} class option is enabled.)
To automatically add the label in front of the number, we can use \verb|\autoref|: \autoref{comment:2.3}.
It is also possible to set an additional custom label by passing the \texttt{label} option to the comment environment, e.g., \autoref{comment:work-not-good} was mean.
\end{revresponse}
\reviewer
\begin{revcomment}
Did you know, that the references can be separated for the individual reviewers?
\end{revcomment}
\begin{revresponse}
Yes. When using \href{https://www.ctan.org/pkg/biblatex}{biblatex}, you can use the \texttt{refsection=section} option to achieve that.
If we cite a new reference like \cite{Besser2021} here, it will again be number [1].
Note that you might have to run \texttt{pdflatex} and \texttt{biber} multiple times.
And reference [1] for \autoref{rev:2}~\cite{ReviewerReference} is now number [2].
\printpartbibliography{Besser2021,ReviewerReference}
\end{revresponse}
\end{document}